Developers vs Testers – Roles, Responsibilities, and the Human Side of Testing
When we talk about testing, everyone has something in mind… but not always the same thing.
For some, testing means technical checks: performance, load, security. For others, it’s about making sure the application meets business needs.
The truth is that testing is a wide universe, and that’s often where clashes between developers and testers appear:
- Who should write certain tests?
- Which tasks are best handled by developers?
- Which ones are more suitable for testers?
Let’s take a look at this world, clarify roles and responsibilities, and highlight the importance of speaking a common language so the team can move forward together.
1. Types of testing according to ISTQB
The ISTQB (International Software Testing Qualifications Board) is not a standard itself, but an organization that provides frameworks and syllabi widely used in the industry. They help classify testing levels, which also guides responsibilities:
- Unit Testing → Typically developers. They validate that each function, class, or method works in isolation.
- Integration Testing (between modules) → Usually developers. Ensuring different code components interact correctly.
- System Testing (functional and non-functional) → Often testers. Evaluating the system as a whole: from user experience to performance and security.
- System Integration Testing → Testers. Making sure the system communicates correctly with external systems.
- Functional Testing → Primarily testers, though developers must understand the business criteria.
- Non-Functional Testing → Testers with specialized skills. According to the ISO/IEC 25010:2011 standard, this includes performance, security, reliability, usability, maintainability, portability, among others.
2. Developers’ role in testing
Developers don’t just write code; they’re also responsible for the first line of defense in quality.
Key testing practices for developers include:
- Unit Tests: ensuring the code works as expected from the very beginning.
- Integration Tests (at code level): making sure classes, services, or internal APIs collaborate correctly.
- Code Reviews: not a formal test, but a critical peer verification practice.
- Initial Automation: writing scripts or pipelines to run tests automatically.
As a practice, these are tightly linked to development work and should not be “handed off” to testers, since they require direct knowledge of the code.
3. Testers’ role
Testers complement developers by covering broader aspects related to the business perspective and user experience.
- System Testing: verifying that the whole system meets requirements.
- System Integration Testing: validating connections with external systems (ERP, CRM, payment gateways, etc.).
- Functional Testing: thinking like the customer — does the app really do what the business needs?
- Non-Functional Testing: performance, load, security, accessibility (following ISO/IEC 25010).
- Exploratory Testing: testing without strict scripts — clicking around, simulating real user behavior, and discovering unexpected scenarios developers may not have considered.
The focus here isn’t the code itself, but how the solution works in the real world.
4. Where confusion usually arises
One of the biggest problems in projects is the different interpretation of terms:
- For a developer, “integration test” may mean checking that two classes communicate properly.
- For a tester, “integration test” may mean ensuring the CRM integrates correctly with the billing system.
Background also plays a role: testers coming from less technical paths may focus more on functionality, while developers may overlook business nuances. If teams don’t align definitions early, they risk duplicating efforts or leaving critical gaps.
5. The human side of testing
Testing isn’t just technical, it’s also cultural.
I’ve seen testers nodding in meetings saying “yes, I understand” even when they didn’t fully grasp what the developer was explaining. They may take the easy path of claiming understanding to move on quickly, but this silence, which seems harmless, can later lead to bugs, rework, or weeks of delay.
The solution lies in:
- Creating an environment where asking questions isn’t seen as weakness.
- Using a shared vocabulary: if we say “integration testing,” clarify at which level.
- Respecting each other’s role: developers shouldn’t expect QA to do their unit tests, and testers shouldn’t assume developers always understand the business perspective.
- Aligning with requirements, Definition of Done (DoD) and clear KPIs to define what quality means for the project.
6. Conclusion: Quality is everyone’s responsibility
- Code-level tests (unit and module integration) are generally the responsibility of developers.
- System and business-level tests are usually covered by testers.
But quality is never “owned” by just one role — it’s a shared effort.
👉 If you’re a developer: write unit tests with your team (and your future self) in mind.
👉 If you’re a tester: learn basic development concepts and APIs, ask questions without fear, and make sure the application makes sense for the end user.
Because in the end, the best products come from teams where developers and testers understand and collaborate, not from invisible walls dividing responsibilities.
Comments
Post a Comment